What is the interpretation of our hearing of an inner voice and the dialogue with it?

What is the interpretation of our hearing of an inner voice and the dialogue with it?

The “faint voice in the head” can be the person’s strongest critic or greatest supporter, and soliloquy is known to help give directions, give advice, rehearse difficult conversations, and even remind many of the issues of daily life, according to a report published by the website. Live Science.

The report indicated that for a long time it was believed that the self-conversation or the inner voice that many people listen to is simply a part of the human being, but it turns out that some may not live the state of invoking the soul as words or sentences, where they can imagine an image or form There are people who do not listen to any words or sentences and cannot imagine or visualize any things in their minds.

Helen Lowenbrook, senior researcher in psychology and neurocognition and head of the language team at the French National Center for Research CNRS, said that "what is meant by the inner talk of the soliloquy, is that a person can conduct a private speech directed to himself in silence and without any expression or voice," in other words. It is what can be defined as a monologue or silent self-talk. During a true monologue, a person can almost “hear” his inner voice, and even be aware of its tone and tone. For example, the tone of voice can "sound" as angry or anxious.

Research has shown that children between the ages of 5 and 7 can silently use the inner voice or soliloquy. Some studies suggest that babies may use some form of internal phonetics as early as 18 to 21 months of age.

Professor Lowenbrook's research addresses inner soliloquy in three dimensions, according to a 2019 study she and her team published in Frontiers in Psychology.

The first dimension is “dialogue,” which can be complex internal speech. At this point there is a debate about whether it is accurate to call all inner speech a "monologue". So the first dimension measures whether a person is thinking in the form of a monologue or a dialogue with himself. A “monologue” simply occurs when someone thinks of something like, “I need to buy bread.” They can hear an inner voice say that sentence. But at other times, when the same person is thinking of something else, it may not be just a word or sentence where he can "listen" to a number of points of view and can exchange opinions with himself in a silent dialogue.

As for the second dimension, it is related to the so-called “condensation,” which is a measure of the extent to which a person dwells in inner discourse or self-talk. Sometimes a person thinks only of simple words or gestures. But at other times, particularly when he's having an important conversation with someone else or doing an audience presentation for example, he's likely to think of whole sentences and paragraphs.

The third dimension deals with the “intention” to engage in self-indulgence on purpose. Deliberate involvement in soliloquy occurs for unknown reasons. Self-talk can sometimes drift into completely random and seemingly disconnected topics.

Professor Lovenbrook added that, through research conducted by Professor Russell Hurlburt, a psychologist at the University of Nevada in Las Vegas in the late XNUMXs, an old hypothesis that "all human beings depend on the inner voice of soliloquy" was for the first time challenged.

Hurlburt studied the soliloquy of several volunteers who used a device that beeps regularly and had to write down what they were thinking or experiencing just before the device beeped. Then his research team discussed what was written down with the study participants.

And if a participant wrote down the phrase “I need to buy some bread,” the researcher would ask him if this was what he actually thought, meaning did he think of the word “bread” specifically, or did he feel hungry, or was there a feeling in his stomach? With the multiplicity of meetings, the performance of the participants improved in expressing their true ideas.

Ultimately, Professor Lowenbrook said, this methodology revealed that some people had a lot of soliloquy, almost as if "there's a radio in their heads". But others had less inner speech than usual, and a third group had no inner soliloquy at all, only images, sensations, and emotions, but without hearing an inner voice or words.

The lack of an inner monologue has been linked to a condition called "aphantasia", sometimes called "mind's eye blindness". People with Aphantasia have no visualizations in their minds, they cannot mentally visualize their bedroom or their mother's face. Professor Lovenbrook pointed out that those who do not have the ability to visualize or imagine, often lack listening to the clear self-conversation as well.

Professor Lowenbrook explained that aphantasia and the lack of an inner voice are not necessarily a bad thing, but that a better understanding of inner speech and the wide range of thought processes people go through could be a particularly important step for developing “methods of learning and teaching in general.”

Other topics: 

How do you deal with someone who intelligently ignores you?

http://عشرة عادات خاطئة تؤدي إلى تساقط الشعر ابتعدي عنها